Blazing a trail of Truth through Life's jungle of liesWhere's my machete....
ID_Raptor
read my profile
sign my guestbook

Visit ID_Raptor's Xanga Site!

Name: Truth
Country: United States
State: Indiana
Gender: Male


Message: message me


Member Since: 11/10/2003

SubscriptionsSites I Read

Posting Calendar

|<< oldest | newest >>|
view all weblog archives

Get Involved!

Suggest a link

Recommend to friend

Create a site


Monday, November 15, 2004

The contest posted here no longer exists, therefore it no longer is posted

Thank you


Wednesday, October 13, 2004

First off, this was initially posted on my HammerofMars site, but considering that this is an area where I have a strong opinion, I figured it was appropiate to be moved here.  OK, here's the gist of this post.  I've been in contact with another xanga member who for various reasons is not planning on voting.  Several people have given this individual a lot of flak for this position and after a while here is what was posted:

"Some of you don't like my current views on voting and some of you don't like Kerry (ok, most of you don't like him).  So, here's my question: Would you rather me a) not vote, b) vote for Kerry?  You cannot say, "you should vote for Bush." You must choose one of those answers and then tell me why?"

my response (keep in mind that at this point in time I have had multiple 'conversations' with this person on this topic; also, Bigcat was someone who commented before I did and pointed out several of Sen. Kerry's stands [if you can call them that with how much he fluctuates] that are blatantly against God):

<*<* begin edit *>*>
(sorry about the typos, didn't check it before I posted)
<*<* end edit *>*>

I'm with Bigcat, and from the looks at against almost everyone else.  I think it's obvious that with previous 'discussions' (if you will) we've had neither of us have changed our viewpoints (I'm not saying that's a bad thing or a good thing, just pointing it out).  I do agre with Jess' point of, "by not saying anything you're silently agreeing" which is actually one of the reasons I started 'talking' with you on the topic in the first place.

I first off majorly disagree with hmmlife, I honestly cannot comprehend what is going through anyone's mind who is even considering voting for Sen. Kerry, the man is a walking book of contradictions and most certainly not capable of leading our country.  My second disagreement is that it seems that several of the others who have commented are saying that if it comes to one or the other (not voting or voting for Sen. Kerry) then you should go ahead and vote anyway so as to not waste the lives of our countrymen who have died for us...but then they also say not to vote for Sen. Kerry...that standpoint contradicts the rules set down in your post.  That said:
Given the two choices:
1.) Vote Sen. Kerry
2.) Don't vote at all
I would have to say 2.) Don't vote at all.  Here is why; though I agree with Jess' comment of being silent consenting, given only those two options, not voting would be actively voting against Sen. Kerry.  However, here is the flaw in the logic of your question:  Presenting your standpoint as only choice or the other is not a good way of making your point, because in reality there are more choices than you have presented.  Pres. Bush is an option, as is the third party candidate, and as I think a couple have mentioned, there is always writing someone in.

OK, here's the long part and then I'll stop bugging ya'....for tonight anyways:  The major flaw I see in reasoning (in general, not on the question posed) is that you say you want to make a difference, you want to spread the word, you want to do your part to make this world a better place and to help increase the numbers in Heaven after this life...yet when you are faced with a relatively simple choice in this life (that of voting) that could make a gross difference in the ease of your endeavor you back down and say you want no part of it.  Perhaps flaw is the wrong word, and it's still just that I don't understand your viewpoint, but from what I have seen so far, you keep contradicting yourself.  I don't claim to know what prompted this particualr post, but I hope it wasn't posted as a chance to justify your position, because if it was, then you are sadly mistaken in your method.  If you are choosing not to vote because you feel that God has forbidden you to do so, fine, I will not tell you that your wrong and should go against your concience (Rom14:14). 

However, I honestly cannot see how anyone can look at this election and not see the Spiritual battle that is ensuing.  Just looking at the morals of these men clearly dictates a right and wrong choice, for me, this hits really close to James 4:17, "Therefore to him who knoweth to do good, and doeth it not, to him it is sin".  To me, this right we have called voting, isn't just some buttons we push that programmed into a card to get some man into office; to me this is one of the many weapons we have to fight the ever growing war against sin in this world today.  Like it or not, beleive it or not, the leader of our country makes a huge difference in the morals that country upholds to be he elected into a democracy or appointed as a dictator.  Look at the Old Testament, particularily at the kings of the Divided Kingom.  Look to Queen Esther, God's Will will be done, will you help it where you can? or let the apportunity pass to another?  It's a judgement call we all have to make.  Personally, I can't stand by and watch as Satan pics apart our defenses, I choose to fight.  It is true that we have a shield of Faith to protect agains his fiery darts (Eph. 6:16) but Faith must be maintained by our works (James 2:18).  If you have a chance to help push our country in the right direction, is it really showing Faith to turn away and let that chance pass by? or is it showing complacency to -- possibly even outright acceptance of -- a rejection of God's Will?

something to think on

Later


Wednesday, October 06, 2004

page is undergoing updates, please be patient while these changes are being made....


Saturday, June 26, 2004

I recently sent out an e-mail on the bill going up to prohibit homosexual ‘marriage’ (I believe ‘civil union’ is the term being used).  Anyway, I received a rather…heated e-mail from a friend on that list for my opposition to making such unions legal.  I do not have my friends e-mail posted here, and will not send it out if asked, so don’t.  However, I thought it appropriate to post my reply as this is my ‘strong opinions’ site, and I believe that the general idea of what was said is fairly easily derived from my reply.  As a note, the link referenced is a link to the site you are now viewing and the quote comes from ‘Realities’ whish is posted below.  Also, I removed my friends name which was used a couple of times and replaced it with “Friend”.  Enjoy.

**********************************************************

Easy there Friend, first I want to give you this link: http://www.xanga.com/home.aspx?user=ID_raptor

it is a paper I wrote a few semesters ago for an English course here at Purdue.  The particular area of interest at this time is about 6 or 7 paragraphs down if you just want to skip to it....for that matter, here is that part; you can go to the site if you want to see the rest of the paper.  Make sure you read ALL of this section even if you don't like what you see, and especially if you do; I had to write it in such a way as to try and at least attempt to show both angles. 

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

(from 'Realities' by Mark Ramsey)

 

Part of what makes our nation great is our ability to accept people with their abnormalities. We can look past our differences and see that everyone, deep down, has some good in them that should be fully explored and shown to those who may not see that goodness. The homosexual lifestyle is an example of how far we are willing to tolerate people’s differences. We realize that some people are just "that way" and that we have no justification to judge them on their personal convictions. We have even gained the courage to allow the homosexual populace a place in Society that was previously held only for heterosexual married couples. We have indeed proceeded far on the road of acceptance.

 

We are required to respect each other as people, as human beings, not as social structures. I have nothing against gays/lesbians as people. I have a problem with their lifestyles; I disagree with their sexual beliefs. Free speech does not mean we all must listen to an opinion; it means an individual has the right to express an opinion. "So don’t listen" you say, that’s all well and good, except that, again, I will get tagged as a racist, homophobic, or some other trumped up charge. Has anyone ever considered referring to the homosexual as heterophobic? Homosexuals claim that they can’t control who or what they are and we (everyone else) should just accept them. Bull. My reflex (that I "can’t" control) is to gag with even the thought of having a relationship with another male, of having another male as my partner, but I am expected to suck it up and suck it in so as not to offend. Complete hypocrisy in its purist form, "Deal with me for and what I am; but control yourself so as not to offend me". Don’t think so, people. That is now how it works. Homosexuality is not some terminal disease that someone is infected with and can’t be vaccinated for, it is a choice. Occasionally there are cases where a person has tendencies to be attracted to a member of the same gender. We also see this in the animal kingdom, where the reaction to such behavior is to shun the creature acting on these "traits". Maybe we should take a hint from our animal friends.

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

 

I also have an article from the campus paper (which supports gay marriage by the way, and is probably a piece you would enjoy more than my paper) that I am in the process of writing a reply to of sorts that will be posted (on the same site above) once I get it done, and would be happy to get you a copy once it’s completed if you wish.

 

A few other notes: 

1.) 'Separation of Church and State', I'm sorry, but bull.  That argument is weak at best.  This attack is not only on the sacredness of marriage, but a direct assault on the Church by the State.  This is a moral issue plain and simple.  You contradict yourself in your own argument.  Yes, GOD gave us this thing called Love, and GOD gave us restrictions on how to use this gift.  GOD gave us the blessed union of marriage, and GOD also restricted its use to one man and one woman (it's initiated way back at the beginning in Genesis 2:22-24 if you want to double check, and I can get other verses to verify this if you wish).  GOD also gave us this country to live and be blessed in, and this country has responded by repeatedly slapping Him in the face with our self-centeredness.  GOD gave us the State, and GOD can take it away, and no cry of, “Separation of Church and State!” will stop Him, or save anybody if He chooses to do so.  To say that this is an issue of Church vs. State is a lousy attempt at an excuse at best.

 

2.)  A fatal misunderstanding by many in this country is that there can be such a thing as marriage between to people of the same sex.  There is a reason for the saying, “Coming out of the closet”, and it is not something that should be respectable by any means, but our society is so morally degraded these days that instead of feeling the shun that should accompany such a claim, this world would rather embrace these individuals for “expressing themselves” and “braking the mold”.  Frankly, this practice is nothing short of sickening, but the world tries to hammer into us that it is something good and wonderful...and that’s just a load of bureaucratic, satanic garbage.  The marriage union is not something that the State has a right to define; it had already been decided long before the State had anything to do with anything, and we don’t get a say in the matter.  Marriage is for one man, and one woman.  Period.  To claim otherwise attacks what little moral fiber this country has left.  It brutally assaults the family, and vilely slanders the Holy bond of marriage.

 

3.)  Going back to the saying, “Coming out of the closet”, this saying came into to play because people as a whole were against this disgusting act of homosexuality.  This was not an opinion forced on them by the State, it was a natural reaction to be repulsed at the concept, and still should be today.  The general acceptance of this act is not a social advancement, but one of many of the building blocks to our demise.  Most people including homosexuals know deep down inside (some deeper than others) that homosexuality is WRONG.  It is something we have to train our minds to accept, something we have to harden our consciences against defying.  “Coming out of the closet” is not something anyone should be proud of doing, but is something that should be feared; that is not to say they should fear for their lives mind you, but fear of the lack of acceptance, even to the point of being shunned by any and all civil social structures.

 

4.)  Again, returning to the statements made on Church and State.  Look at previous history….just think about this for a minute.  The article I referred to earlier made the completely bogus claim that homosexuals were not looking for social acceptance, but only equal rights to privileges such as tax breaks that are given to married couples.  Garbage, absolute garbage; they know, as do their lawyers, that such a law opens the door to multiple lawsuits, including the suing of the Church for sexual discrimination in not allowing ‘married’ homosexual couples to become members based on there un-Biblical and immoral union.  I ask you, how does that fit into your Separation of Church and State claim?  The reason behind that part of ‘very special legal document’ as you call it, was to keep the State from governing the Church.  It was implemented because of the various doctrinal backgrounds of the Founding Fathers of this nation and the realization that controlling the country by controlling its religion was one of the reasons for searching for the New World in the first place.  Our country was founded on Godly principals, but we seem to be possessed by the urge to completely destroy as many of the principles as possible.  You’d think 9/11 would’ve been a wake up call, and for many it was…for an unreasonably short time albeit…that this country is going downhill fast.

5.) Another gross misunderstanding (gross being used with both definitions of intensely large and sickening in mind) by many in society today is that of believing that love of another individual must necessitate sexual interaction (for the most part family members are not included).  I very deeply love and cherish my relationship with my male friends, this does not make me homosexual nor does it require sexual actions to prove.  To answer your question (rhetorical though it may have been), no American has the right to tell another whom he/she can or cannot love, nor the actions by which said individuals show their love for each other.  However, GOD, our creator, has EVERY right to define and limit these actions for Americans, Asians, Russians, and whoever else you want to throw in the mix.

 

Now, as far as learning to tolerate those that are different, there is a significant difference between toleration and acceptance/encouragement.  I accept that those around me may not believe what I believe.  I accept that there are those out there who will do what I see as wrong and think they are fine.  I appreciate that I do not know everything and that those who believe and think differently than me can and do provide me with insight into other acceptable possibilities.  And I tolerate those who go against what I believe is right.  As I mention in my paper, many homosexual people are some of the nicest people you will meet in the world, I know, I have met quite a few have even worked with some that I get along with quite well.  It is not the people that offend, it is the actions in which they participate.  It is the hypocritical way in which many present themselves and how we should accept them into our society.  The offense comes through the people, but does not make them as people unacceptable. 

 

Don’t you believe for a minute that I have been starved of any Truths, that I am somehow incapable of understanding the situation in which we now find ourselves.  To you, this proposed law seems to be an atrocity that few are committing against those who would proclaim themselves to be happy.  In Truth, we are in a war; this war is being fought with words and laws…and the cost is not something as menial as human lives.  No, the outcome of these battles will be paid for with our souls throughout eternity.  This is a spiritual battle being fought Friend, not some simple minded law that will give happiness to a few sick minds.  I have no hate for these people, only pity.  It is not I or any other Christians who send them to Hell; it is they who send themselves to Hell, they have a choice to make as do we all.  God will judge us for our actions, no matter whether our law gives credence to them or not.  In the end, there is only His Law, and His Law forbids this union.  I will do what I can to see that our country does not dig itself any deeper into the pit of Sin it has engulfed itself in, and do my best to do my part in trying to bring it back around.  Right now, the best I can do is try and present the Truth to whoever I can, even if that is done in a simple e-mail.

 

I don’t want and do not accept your grace nor your forgiveness for the previous e-mail or this one.  I am not starved of anything, the Truth least of all; I stand firmly behind what I have had to say.


Saturday, May 22, 2004

I will apologize now if any of my posts offend someone, but I encourage these people to honestly look at WHY they may be offended by what I have to say. Is your offense justified? Or does your irritation fall into another category? You see, the Truth only hurts when it should.....Does this hurt?  Think about it, and enjoy!

***********************************************************************

Realities

With all the people out there looking for causes of this or that catastrophe, one would think that something would have been turned up by now: a reason for our suffering, an explanation, a decent excuse even. But no, all that seemingly can be found is a chain, a never-ending stream of events that entwines anything and everything outside the problem into the core as its source. Little do many realize that the cause of our daily trials is so near us that it could create havoc in our very own homes at any given moment; that the perpetrator is seen quite frequently. Many of have not made the connection that the miserable creatures that cause all our distresses stare at us every day, not from under a rock or with a hidden camera, but straight into our faces. Those creatures are Us.

I am so sick and tired of this racial/sexist/homosexual discrimination/minority garbage. This is it, my testimony. I would say, "How it really is" but then some supposed minority could sue me for discrimination and the hypothetical psychological damage such a statement would "cause". Society hammers away at the white, heterosexual male; everything from job opportunities, to scholarships, to sports. Companies are called to court over hiring/promoting a He.W.M. instead of his homosexual co-worker in the next cubicle. There are scholarships for Black Female Engineers, Hispanic Male Teachers, Female Asian Designers, et cetera; but nowhere will you find a scholarship for a White Male Anything, no, that would be "Discriminatory"! Such a scholarship would earn an organization a label of being "Sexist" and "Racist", not to mention get its pants sued off by as many minorities as could jump onto the lawsuit and get their collective foot into the door.

Let’s look at some specifics of a common area of argument within the racial discrimination structure. One of the three big inflammatory sections is that of language. This world is filled with many languages, each from multiple nations and many diverse cultures. Some languages are more common around the world than others, and are therefore useful to know. Two of these in this general area are Spanish and English. Particularly in Asian areas, Chinese is a common tongue. Many of these worldwide cultures have incorporated into the social structure if the United States, enriching it with co-operative diversity. Our many cultures clash, combine, and smooth the surface to pull together as a nation, especially during tragedies; 9/11 for example. But unfortunately, we no sooner began our recovery before we shot ourselves in the foot.

Boy is THAT an understatement! Forget the foot, we keep stabbing ourselves in various limbs; we seem determined to take each other apart! Language, ha! One of many misrepresented areas that has been blown way out of proportion, "I wasn’t hired because I can’t speak English and no one else could understand me!" O boo-hoo, welcome to America, Land of the Free, where our common language is English, not Chinese, Spanish, Portuguese, German, or anything else. E – N – G – L – I – S – H. You don’t like it? Then move to another country. Freedom of speech does not mean I have to learn how to speak your language to accommodate you and make you happy. If I choose to, that’s one thing, and great for you! You’ll have someone who can understand you: Yay! Our constitution does not give you the right to impose your culture on everyone else: physically, mentally, linguistically, psychologically, or any other way; you may present it, but I am not obligated to accept it. Here is an e-mail going around that sums it up nicely:

"This makes a lot of sense to me. It's about time somebody said it.

     IMMIGRANTS, NOT AMERICANS, MUST ADAPT. I am tired of this
     nation worrying about whether we are offending some individual or their
     culture. Since the terrorist attacks on Sept. 11, we have experienced a surge
     in patriotism by the majority of Americans. However, the dust from the
     attacks had barely settled when the "politically correct" crowd began
     complaining about the possibility that our patriotism was offending others.

     I am not against immigration, nor do I hold a grudge against anyone who is
     seeking a better life by coming to America. Our population is almost entirely
     comprised of descendants of immigrants. However, there are a few things
     that those who have recently come to our country, and apparently some born
     here, need to understand.

     This idea of America being a multicultural community has served only to
     dilute our sovereignty and our national identity. As Americans, we have our
     own culture, our own society, our own language and our own lifestyle. This
     culture has been developed over centuries of struggles, trials, and victories by
     millions of men and women who have sought freedom.

     We speak ENGLISH, not Spanish, Arabic, Chinese, Japanese, Russian, or
     any other language. Therefore, if you wish to become part of our society,
     learn the language!

     "In God We Trust" is our national motto. This is not some Christian, right
     wing, political slogan. We adopted this motto because Christian men and
     women, on Christian principles, founded this nation, and this is clearly
     documented. It is certainly appropriate to display it on the walls of our
     schools. If God offends you, then I suggest you consider another part of the
     world as your new home, because God is part of our culture. " [sic]

     If Stars and Stripes offend you, or you don't like Uncle Sam, then you should
     seriously consider a move to another part of this planet. We are happy with
     our culture and have no desire to change, and we really don't care how you
     did things where you came from. This is OUR COUNTRY, our land, and
     our lifestyle.

     Our First Amendment gives every citizen the right to express his opinion and
     we will allow you every opportunity to do so. But, once you are done 
     complaining, whining, and griping about our flag, our pledge, our national
     motto, or our way of life, I highly encourage you to take advantage of one 
     other great American freedom, THE RIGHT TO LEAVE.

Author Unknown"

So what if the eighty-year-old shopkeeper didn’t learn your language when he was in high school or college several decades ago? If you want a job at that shop, then learn the shopkeeper’s language, not the other way around. If I go to China to work, I cannot and do not expect all Chinese to learn English to accommodate me, I am the visitor, I must adapt. This bureaucratic garbage of lawsuits doesn’t do anything positive for your "minority" or your (unworthy) cause. It does show you to be a little, stuck-up, punk whiner who picks on old folks for a living. Yeah, look real tough don’t ya’, strutting your old-folk-beating stuff. "Hey, watch out. This whiner is just trouble," is more like it.

Part of what makes our nation great is our ability to accept people with their abnormalities. We can look past our differences and see that everyone, deep down, has some good in them that should be fully explored and shown to those who may not see that goodness. The homosexual lifestyle is an example of how far we are willing to tolerate people’s differences. We realize that some people are just "that way" and that we have no justification to judge them on their personal convictions. We have even gained the courage to allow the homosexual populace a place in Society that was previously held only for heterosexual married couples. We have indeed proceeded far on the road of acceptance.

We are required to respect each other as people, as human beings, not as social structures. I have nothing against gays/lesbians as people. I have a problem with their lifestyles; I disagree with their sexual beliefs. Free speech does not mean we all must listen to an opinion; it means an individual has the right to express an opinion. "So don’t listen" you say, that’s all well and good, except that, again, I will get tagged as a racist, homophobic, or some other trumped up charge. Has anyone ever considered referring to the homosexual as heterophobic? Homosexuals claim that they can’t control who or what they are and we (everyone else) should just accept them. Bull. My reflex (that I "can’t" control) is to gag with even the thought of having a relationship with another male, of having another male as my partner, but I am expected to suck it up and suck it in so as not to offend. Complete hypocrisy in its purist form, "Deal with me for and what I am; but control yourself so as not to offend me". Don’t think so, people. That is now how it works. Homosexuality is not some terminal disease that someone is infected with and can’t be vaccinated for, it is a choice. Occasionally there are cases where a person has tendencies to be attracted to a member of the same gender. We also see this in the animal kingdom, where the reaction to such behavior is to shun the creature acting on these "traits". Maybe we should take a hint from our animal friends.

Throughout our history, many minorities have been discriminated against, and our government has done an excellent job of taking care of those discriminations. It has snuffed out all outright discrimination in the work place in pure fear that the government’s iron fist will fell the one who dares oppose it. We are proud for passing our differences and becoming a tighter nation, one that can stand up to all fronts because of our diversity and trust in each other.

In a world that challenges everything, how can anyone claim that they alone are discriminated against? WAKE UP PEOPLE! There is no such thing as "Equality", and there never will be. Our views of this vague thing "Equality" don’t overlay each other; they may overlap in areas of agreement, but they never truly and completely cover each other. No two views are EXACTLY the same! All but those that are currently in power are a minority, period. To overcome that position, one must become the majority. They must become the one(s) in power by overthrowing the current system to implement their own. If this is done, there is a new a new majority, not equality. History shows that equality will never exist as those in power find themselves in control and unwilling to give that control up. History also shows that sooner or later the pattern will again repeat itself, destroying the current Majority to implement a new one. It’s a futile war, and effort that cannot, and will not, be completed; a war that cannot be won. If two people cannot agree with 100% understanding and compatibility, why are we so naive as to think that an entire country, and eventually the entire world will be capable of such a feat?

For example, let’s say that we have a set of heterosexual, black male Siamese twins, Ted and Tod. Ted wants to go to bed and Tod wants to get a shower. Both cannot be done at the same time, so one or the other must give up what they want to do: Ted gets to go to bed, or Tod gets his shower. Ted and Tod may both eventually get what they want, but one or the other has to de-prioritize what he wants to get. Another option would be for neither to get what they wanted and instead go and get something to eat, but now both lose something and the alternative may or may not be equally satisfying to the brothers. Now there is also another problem on my hands because I most likely have offended part of my audience. I have several minorities ticked at me: the Feminists because I used a male example instead of a female one, the gays/lesbians because the example was heterosexual and not homosexual, the Asian man is angry because he was not represented, and the list goes on. In fact, the only minority that isn’t ticked off at me is the black heterosexual male because he was represented, but everyone else was left out. There is no way to appease everyone. If the brothers became non-racial and non-sexual, simply "it" or "they" someone would be offended; if no one else, then the Siamese twin population as being put into a segment of "its" and "theys". Do you get the point? This vague thing we call "Equality" is not possible, it is fallacy.

Race, the color of our skin or the accent one speaks with is looked on as an identifying mark that allows us to see the individual pieces of our countries puzzle. We cannot choose our ethnic background, but we can learn and build on the foundations of our ancestors to mold ourselves a nation that cannot be surpassed. Though our skins be of different shades, blood flows red through our bodies and for our sisters/brothers who have made this country great.

But the claim of racism is almost as bad as the homosexual argument. Unlike homosexuality, I see nothing wrong with being different here. Let me clarify: skin color, language, traditions, et cetera are all well and good, but some of these traditions are not suited for all to see at any given moment and the language barrier is one that will always exist in some form. These traditions are another issue that is loaded with hypocrisy. We try to "culturalize" the so-called "third-world countries", but then come home and launch multi-million dollar enterprises to try save the already decimated American-Indian ways. HELLO! Does this really make any sense? And how is this productive to anyone considering that as soon as a race becomes "cultured" it will try to save its "culture" for future generations. Do the words: "Make up your mind!" mean anything anymore? I mean, come on people! How many times and in how many ways do we have to be shown we can’t have it both ways? These are the facts, like them or not, I really don’t care. It’s called life, and it’s time to grow up and live it. The majority of these so-called "minorities" exist in the mind, and nowhere else; or rather, the supposed problems that are caused by being part of a "minority" exist in the mind. Now do not get me wrong here. I realize that we cannot control our ancestry and that there will be differences, but these are facts, not excuses. The fact is, we did not ASK to be born, quoting Bill Cosby on parents, "And if you HAD asked, I would’ve said NO!"

Another advancement in our country’s long line of achievements is how much our females participate in our societies everyday activities. We are one of the few countries whose women participate in almost every field of our society, from government to home-life; our women have just as prominent a role as our men.

Sexism? Give me a break, girls. You’ve got it well off and you know it. You have the whole world wrapped around your collective finger. You cry, and someone is there to comfort you, give you a shoulder to cry on. You get down; someone is there to sympathize. You cry out "sexist!" and you have a million lawyers licking at your heels for the job. Guys? We cry, and are told to get over it, we’re being too emotional. We get down, and we’re told to snap out of it, there’s work to do. We cry out "sexist!" and are lucky if we can find some lawyer in a dark alleyway willing to anonymously support us, and are then laughed at for the effort. Girls, you want equality? I have yet to hear of a feminist pushing for higher insurance for female drivers. No, all you have to say is, "we want, we want, we want". Something you think you deserve because a guy has it and you don’t. And surely all men are at best your equals while most don’t even make it that high. Sorry girls, not buying it. Your arguments are not valid. In fact, you have a more prominent role than the men do, though it is rarely recognized it as such. You are entrusted with the upbringing of the next generation; you are shaping the world of tomorrow! But you can’t be satisfied with that. Why? "Mother", the most honorable title available on this earth, and you can’t be satisfied. Try focusing on what you do have, instead of what you don’t; you all may realize how good you really have it.

The "minorities" use the Constitution as a weapon to back up their whining, twisting what the words say to get them the best result. What makes this worse is the fact that the courts are letting them. When we have cases where someone spills coffee on themselves and then is able to sue the restaurant because they "…didn’t know it was hot," we should hear a loud warning bell going off. How long will it take us to realize how far we have fallen? How many Stella Wards will we have to go thru before we see how pathetic and child-like we have become? We are so worried about the number one, the I/me, that we don’t even take time to consider what our actions might cause. Society teaches us that we are the center of the world, that it revolves around us as if each individual were some type of sun. No wonder we’re having so many problems. I am no astronomer, but I’ll bet you if two suns crashed together, there would be a mighty big explosion to follow, and an impossible mess to clean up as well. How much more with millions and millions of suns crashing into each other at once? The causes of our problems have nothing to do with skin color or any other physical boundaries. They are all in the mind, and as long as we try and this battle as a physical one, we are doomed to failure forever.

In general, not everyone deserves something that someone else has; all they deserve is a chance to achieve it. Even those that do deserve that something rarely get it. This is not discrimination, it is just the way it is, period. No amount of whining is going to change that. If you don’t like it, well that’s just too bad. There are many things in this life that I don’t like, but I have to deal with it anyway. Right now, all this bureaucratic garbage is part of that thorn. I am a Heterosexual, White, Christian male, and I am proud of it. If you don’t like that, I am sorry that you may be offended, but there is no justification for feeling so or to penalize me for it. If you still have a problem here, let me know and I’ll see if I can’t scrounge up fifty cents so you can call someone who cares about your bad attitude.

This country is composed of many achievements, some won with blood, some with ink; but those achievements mean nothing without a people to do something constructive with them. Our greatest "accomplishments" will ultimately be the cause of our hardest downfall.

Equality: A vague, yet all encompassing desire that many seek for unceasingly. What is this equality; its meaning, its potency? Can it truly be defined with only one definition? Why is something so incompletely defined desired so much that some people are willing to fight for it? Is something so indecipherable really worth fighting for? These are the questions that should be pondered instead of the self-serving garbage that fills our minds constantly. The reality of equality is that it is pure fallacy. Unreachable, uncapturable, but relentlessly striving to ensnare; a foe that cannot be destroyed if one is trying to defeat it. The only defense against this futile battle is to steel oneself against the fantasy of equality with everyone else, but instead realize that we are equal in different ways. Our differences are what make us equal, not our similarities. Our similarities are what help us be acceptable in our chosen habitat, our differences are what define us as individuals and their offset is what gives us the ability to become all that we can be. Our differences make us stronger, not weaker, and to try to destroy those distinctions will destroy us, mentally, and physically. This is what the minorities are fighting for, not their uprising to acceptance, but the destruction of us all. Is that what any of us actually desire?

***********************************************************************

This piece was actually written almost two years ago, and I am currently working on part two (yes, I have more to say and proof to present). It will be posted as soon as it is finished, though my current schedule is hectic enough that I have no idea when this will occur.



Next 5 >>